With a career spanning over 20 years of recording some of the loudest rock in Japan, Soichiro Nakamura is a warm, sincere and very humble jack-of all-trades. From the compact space of his Peace Music studio, located in the suburbs of Tokyo, he blasts out one high-voltage mix after another. The man behind the controls for groups like Boris, Yura Yura Teikoku, Guitar Wolf, Ai Aso, The 5.6.7.8's, Nagisa Ni te, Afrirampo, Tenniscoats, My Pal Foot Foot, Ghost's Michio Kurihara, Maher Shalal Hash Baz, and Nisennenmondai, Nakamura's busy schedule also includes mastering and live sound work, and is a result mostly of word of mouth. His take on Nuggets-era garage rock tones is represented by several bands that revolve around Tokyo's U.F.O. Club, and with his masterful exploitation of apparent volume, sounds come buzzing through mixes that smack like sonic cherry bombs. Also having played in the '90's psychedelic group White Heaven, Nakamura-san's work covers softer, more moody ground as well. From tracking basics to final mastering, he prefers to work with artists on a project from start to finish, sticking with them through the entire process of making a record. As a mastering engineer, Nakamura's ability to carry his distinct sound across several diverse genres is not only limited to new releases, but also a long list of re-mastering including several re-releases for the Captain Trip label.
How and when did Peace Music start?
The studio has been here for almost 20 years now — I started it in 1991. At first, it was called Inter-Music Studio, but after two years we changed the name to Peace Music. We wanted to choose the dumbest name imaginable, and that was it.
Does the studio still double as a rehearsal space?
We have a control room and the small live room and that's it. It's not that big of a space really. We used to use the live room as a rehearsal space at times too. In the beginning rock bands used it, but we also had an Indonesian gamelan ensemble that practiced here as well. I played the kendhang drum with them. We don't use the studio for a practice space much anymore.
You also play on many of the things you record. What would you say is your main instrument?
Mixing is truly my main thing — just being an engineer. For me that is the same as playing guitar, bass or drums. I guess I just like instruments, so in each project that I play with I feel I'm simply adding to the spaces that are open as best that I can.
That sounds like the stance of a true producer.
I just got a Farfisa for the studio. It's just come out of the repair shop. They are pretty hard to find in Japan, so I had my friend in New York get one for me. The reverb circuit is not working, but everything else got fixed.
What kind of console are you currently using?
It's a relatively small Amek board, quite unlike it's model name, the Big. It's 44-channels in-line with four stereo returns. I rarely use more than 24 channels at a time. Before that we had an American CAD console and also a Soundtracks board. I definitely prefer the Amek over both of them because of its wider range and fidelity.
What is your main multitrack recorder? Do you ever record analog?
I have a 1-inch 16-track machine here, but the last time was two years ago for Yura Yura Teikoku's Kudo Desu album. That's mostly because there isn't really any more tape stock left in Japan. It's really hard to get ahold of now, and even if I wanted to record with it, we would have to probably order it from the U.S. I'm mainly using a Tascam X-48, which is a 48-track hard disc recorder. I don't like the sound that you get with Pro Tools so much, especially the way the high end gets brittle and fatiguing. It's just too hard on the ears. I think you can really hear degradation as the number of tracks increases too. But I do have Pro Tools LE, and I think that version 8 is sounding a bit better than before. The spring reverb is fun to play with, and there are a lot of MIDI instruments too. I bought a Mellotron simulator, which is also cool. Either way, when I mix it's always on the Amek, in the analog domain. Before the X-48 I was using a Tascam DA-78. It seemed like an easier conversion from that to the X-48, and in fact the sound is a bit similar as well. I've had some technical troubles, but overall I'm happy with it.
What's your outboard setup like?
I have a Urei 1178 stereo comp, which I use for drums and things, and a dbx 160A, which I like putting bass through. I mainly use them only during mixing. For tracking, I usually stick to the Amek's mic preamps in the board.
Do you compress and EQ as you record as well?
No, when tracking I just get a level and go. The studio is pretty small, so even if you move mics around, the sound doesn't really change that much. My recordings usually make use of a lot of that natural bleed within the room. The Tascam X-48 has some stock plug-ins of its own, and I'll use the compressor sometimes. I go for a really squashed sound, which it delivers pretty well. Many people have said that I seem to love 1 kHz and that my mixes have a really boosted midrange. That's pretty accurate I think.
It's a very rock sound for sure. Would you say you get the most volume out of the mix or mastering stage of your production process?
Mostly during mixing, I think.
How do you approach bass guitars and kick drums? That's really a key to both good phase and keeping things full sounding.
I keep all of the sound that I record. If something is too boomy, I'll just bring up other things around it louder. For the most part, I let the players make their own sounds at the amp. To me there's no such thing as sound I don't need, because there's a good chance that it may be necessary to use later on. Most of my projects here are recorded live, so having bleed is unavoidable. To me it's desirable. I don't like to cut things out. I don't like the idea of organizing sounds into separate units. Instead I prefer sounds that overlap and stay well blended and even somewhat messy.
Your guitar sounds are really great. What do you focus on when making them?
I'm not so into just straight or boring guitar sounds. In the end I think it comes down to the player's technique more than the engineer. It doesn't matter what the equipment costs, just as long as you can get a good sound. I also collect vintage fuzz pedals, so we usually will check out a few of them and try and come up with tones that are interesting.
What do you think about more recent plug-in effects and simulators?
I've tried several digital simulators, but they always end up sounding the same. I prefer to use things that are a bit more rare — mainly vintage Japanese pedals from the 1960's. I have fuzz boxes by makers like Honey, Shin-ei, Royal, and also Univox — like the wah-wah Hendrix always used. I also love old tremolos and tape echoes. I've got a tube tape-echo that sounds good on vocals. It's a rare Japanese one from an old maker called Mirano. In it's day it was pretty expensive, so I don't think a lot of people used them. It was made for guitar, but I think live PA guys also used it on vocals as well. I like big pedals — things like Boss ones are just too small. Their size says it all to me. I use a special tech called Kikuchi-san, who makes different things for me. But I personally don't have any interest in tweaking or bending things with a soldering iron.
I was watching you using a joystick to modulate Sakamoto-san's vocal at the Yura Yura Teikoku show in New York.
That is a modified fuzz box with some sort of oscillator inside. I've used it in the studio too. He made five or six of them for me.
As someone who is often involved with every step of the production process, which part would you say is your favorite or the most satisfying?
That's a tough one. If possible, I prefer to be involved with a project from start to finish. I generally like to move through each phase fairly quickly though. I get impatient with things that take too long, and it's tiring as well. I think it's best for everyone to keep moving and focused on the end result. A lot of my clients have time or budget constraints that make it necessary to finish everything in just a day or two.
How is it working with new bands that you don't know anything about?
I always tell clients when they come here that I'm just like the member of that band who knows the most about mixers and the recording equipment, but is not a totally separate figure. If it's a four-person band, I think of myself as the fifth member. I don't like situations where it's me in the doctor role and a client playing the patient. Instead, I just approach projects as helping the bands to realize their goals more efficiently. It's great when we can push each other towards new ideas. That's the most interesting part for me.
